Fishing Martha's 

Vineyard 

with 

Captain Chris Peters

Convictions of texting motorists boost Texting while driving dangerous.

CDC: Most older teens text while driving – More than half of high school seniors admit they text or email while traveling – the first federal statistics on what common the dangerous habit is certainly in teens www.zovirax200mg.com . Laws on, convictions of texting motorists boost Texting while driving dangerous, study confirms: How dangerous? An anonymous national survey called the National Youth Risk Behavior Survey that was conducted last year found that 58 % of high school seniors stated they had texted or emailed while generating during the prior month. About 43 % of high school juniors acknowledged they did the same thing. Thursday The Centers for Disease Control and Avoidance released the survey outcomes. Some earlier studies had suggested teen texting while generating was common, though not quite so high. Still, the numbers aren’t really surprising, stated Amanda Lenhart, a senior researcher at the Pew Research Middle in Washington. She research how teens use technology. A typical teen sends and receives about 100 text messages a full day time, and it’s the most typical way many kids talk to their peers. During brief car rides Even, it isn’t uncommon for messages to be to arrive and for teenagers to respond, she stated. A whole lot of teens say ‘Well, if the car’s not shifting and I’m at a stoplight or I’m stuck in visitors, that’s Alright,’ said Lenhart, who has done focus groups with teenagers on the topic. Other teens acknowledge they know it’s not safe, but think it is safer if they hold the phone up to allow them to see the street and text at the same time, she said. The CDC study didn’t ask whether high school college students’ texting was completed while the automobile was moving or stopped. The survey is conducted every two years, but this was the very first time it asked about texting while traveling. Based on the Governors Highway Basic safety Association, 39 states, Washington, Guam and the Virgin Islands possess banned texting for all motorists, with varying degrees of punishment, while yet another five states prohibit texting by novice drivers,CBS News reported. Ten states, Washington, Guam and the Virgin Islands prohibit all drivers from using handheld cell phones while driving. Despite the findings, the survey also discovered some improvements among youth when it comes to motor vehicle safety. In the past twenty years, the %age of high schoolers who by no means or rarely wore a seat belt declined from 26 % to 8 %. The %age of children who rode with a driver who’d been drinking also declined, from 40 % in 1991 to 24 % in 2011. The amount of high school students who admitted driving drunk also fell from 17 % in 1997 to 8 % in 2011. Some students are taking part in risky behaviors to their health beyond your car. The survey found just a 1 % drop in the quantity of teens smoking cigarettes . Marijuana cigarette smoking elevated among surveyed teens from 21 % reported in ’09 2009 to 23 % in 2011, which suggests marijuana use is more prevalent than cigarette use among students. We are encouraged that even more of today’s high school students are choosing healthier, safer behaviors, such as wearing seat belts, and so are avoiding behaviors that people know can cause them damage, such as binge drinking or riding with impaired drivers, Dr. Wechsler Howell, director of CDC’s Division of Adolescent and College Health, said in a news release. However, these findings present that despite improvements also, there exists a continued dependence on government agencies, community institutions, schools, parents, and various other community members to interact to address the range of risk behaviors prevalent among our youth. .

zovirax200mg.com

CCPA studies highlight need for improving federal workplace safety On the eve of the National Day of Mourning for workers killed face to face, the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is releasing two studies highlighting the necessity for improved health insurance and security enforcement and regulation. Relating to Achievement is No Incident, by CCPA Analysis Associate David Macdonald, federal government underfunding and understaffing of basic safety inspectors are putting federal jurisdiction employees in harm’s way. The price of disabling accidental injuries in federally regulated workplaces elevated by 5 percent between 2002 and 2007 while the provinces have were able to cut their disabling workplace injuries by typically 25 percent over the same time framework. ‘The freezing of departmental budgets in the 2010 federal budget is already having tangible effects in an inability to boost safety in the workplace’ says Macdonald. ‘Using its budget frozen, HRSDC has no additional resources to beef up inspections and maintain Canadians safe. Workers, among others, will pay the purchase price for indiscriminate budget freezes.’ There aren’t nearly enough federal government inspectors to help make the quantity of recommended visits to very high and high risk worksites. In 2006-07, only 16 percent of the extremely risky workplaces received the requisite two visits a year and just 10 percent of high risk workplaces received their requisite one go to. ‘Many provinces have produced concerted efforts to reduce workplace injuries by targeting risky workplaces and hiring considerably more inspectors,’ clarifies Macdonald. ‘Regrettably for federal government jurisdiction workers–particularly those employed in trucking, at Canada Post or on reserves–HRSDC proceeds to supply its inspectors with inadequate support.’ The scholarly research concludes with several recommendations for improving federal workplace safety. Canada’s Regulatory Obstacle Course, CCPA Senior Economist Marc Lee’s analysis of the federal government’s fresh Cabinet Directive on Streamlining Regulation , suggests that the government’s poor record on workplace safety is not an isolated case but may reflect an across-the-table weakening of the federal regulatory process. ‘The brand new federal method of regulation demands compelling evidence of harm before action can be taken and places health, safety, and environmental worries at risk,’ says Lee. ‘The CDSR areas a ‘chill’ over the advancement of new public interest regulation, and will drinking water down any new steps that do get considered greatly.’.